---

Forex multi-account manager Z-X-N
Accepts global forex account operation, investment, and trading
Assists family office investment and autonomous management

---

In the two-way trading of forex, investors often operate alone. However, this solitary profession offers many unique advantages. Forex trading is not only a highly independent profession, but also provides investors with unprecedented freedom and control.

---

Forex trading is one of the most profitable professions in the world. Investors can achieve profitability through their own decisions and operations without relying on others. Unlike traditional industries, investors do not face the regulatory oversight and intervention of multiple departments, such as the Industrial and Commercial Administration, Public Security Bureau, Urban Management Bureau, and Taxation Bureau. In traditional industries, even those with outstanding personal abilities often face the challenges of various administrative procedures, and in some cases, are forced to follow orders from those who lack the same professional expertise. This situation can often be frustrating and frustrating, but in forex trading, investors can completely avoid these challenges.
Once investors master the skills of forex trading and achieve proficiency through continuous learning and practice, they can achieve a stable income in any economic environment. Whether the economy is booming or bustling, opportunities always exist in the forex market. This means investors can leverage their own abilities to ensure their families' financial security, without having to worry about daily expenses. Furthermore, investors don't have to fawn over others, adapt to their wishes, or spend extensive time and energy managing complex interpersonal relationships. This independence and autonomy is a major draw of forex trading.
More importantly, the career potential of forex trading grows year by year. As investors gain experience and refine their skills, their trading abilities strengthen, leading to higher returns. Unlike many traditional professions, a forex trader's professional value doesn't decline with age. Instead, it increases with experience and market understanding. This sustainable nature of the profession means that as long as investors continue to learn and improve, their future is bright and their wealth will continue to grow.
In short, forex trading is not only a highly independent and free career, but also offers investors the potential for stable income and wealth accumulation. After mastering trading skills, investors can not only achieve financial independence but also continuously advance in their careers, maximizing their personal value. The long-term potential and sustainability of this career make it a sought-after goal for many investors.

In the risk management system of forex trading, "stop-loss" is the default core rule for most traders. However, not using a stop-loss is not necessarily a mistake—it only applies to two types of traders who meet specific conditions: large investors with strong financial resources and those who adopt a light-weight, long-term strategy.

---

For these two groups, not using a stop-loss isn't a blind trade, but a rational choice based on their own resources and trading logic, balanced against their risk tolerance and strategic objectives.
Large Investors with Wealthy Capital: Hedging Short-Term Volatility Risk with Capital Scale. Large investors with deep pockets (such as institutional investors and high-net-worth individuals) choose not to use a stop-loss to hedge against short-term market volatility. The underlying logic can be broken down into three key points:
Redundant capital covers short-term losses. These investors typically have significantly larger capital than average traders, and their positions in a single trade are extremely small. Even if the market moves against their holdings in the short term, the resulting floating losses represent only a tiny percentage of their total capital, posing no threat to overall fund security. For example, an institutional investor with $100 million in capital invested in a currency pair, holding $1 million (1%) in a single position, would only suffer a 10% short-term drawdown, resulting in a floating loss of $100,000, well within their financial tolerance, eliminating the need for stop-loss orders to mitigate risk.
Strategic planning takes precedence over short-term fluctuations. Large investors base their trading decisions on macroeconomic strategies (such as the global economic cycle, monetary policy differences, and the long-term impact of geopolitics) rather than short-term technical fluctuations. Their core goal in holding positions is to capture "trend opportunities spanning months to years." Short-term pullbacks are viewed as "normal corrections within the trend." Setting a stop-loss order could result in a short-term market fluctuation leading to a "washout" and a loss of larger gains. Therefore, not setting a stop-loss order ensures strategic consistency, not ignoring risk.
Risk hedging tools provide a complementary advantage. Most large investors reduce their exposure to single commodities through multi-asset hedging and derivatives (such as foreign exchange options and forward contracts), further mitigating the impact of short-term fluctuations. For example, while holding a long position in a currency pair, they hedge systemic risk through short positions in related commodities. This "active hedging" mechanism significantly enhances the security of "no stop-loss" strategies, eliminating the need to rely on traditional stop-loss strategies to control risk.
Lightweight, long-term investors: Use low positions and trend analysis to mitigate pullback risk. The key to "no stop-loss" for lightweight, long-term investors is to rely on "low positions and firm trend analysis" to keep short-term volatility risks within a tolerable range. This operational logic must meet three prerequisites:
Lightweight positions reduce risk exposure. These investors typically maintain a single position below 5% of their total funds, or even lower (e.g., 2%-3%). This extremely low position ratio means that "short-term floating losses have a minimal impact on the overall account." For example, if an investor holds a lightly weighted 1 standard lot long position in the EUR/USD (approximately 2% of their capital) with a capital of $100,000, even if the exchange rate drops 100 pips in the short term, the floating loss is only $1,000, or 1% of their total capital, far from triggering an "account security crisis," and therefore, there's no need to set a stop-loss.
Holding positions firmly based on trend logic. Long-term investors with lightly weighted positions base their entry decisions on confirming the long-term trend (e.g., determining the trend direction through macroeconomic data, long-term moving averages, and trend structure). They clearly understand that trends inevitably involve pullbacks, and the magnitude of these pullbacks is generally within predictable ranges. Therefore, when faced with short-term floating losses, they prioritize the continuation of the trend. As long as the trend structure remains intact (e.g., long-term moving averages haven't turned up, or key support levels haven't been broken), they will hold their positions firmly, refusing to exit based on short-term fluctuations.
"Not setting a stop-loss" does not mean "not controlling risk." It's important to understand that long-term investors with light positions who don't use stop-loss orders don't necessarily allow risk to escalate. Instead, they shift the focus of risk control from "stop-loss points" to "position management" and "trend analysis." By limiting their single risk limit through light positions and ensuring the correctness of their position through trend tracking, the combined "risk control system" is even safer than short-term strategies that rely on narrow stop-loss orders. The former avoids the risk of false stop-loss breaks, while the latter is prone to frequent stop-loss triggers due to short-term fluctuations, resulting in greater cumulative losses.
The applicable boundaries and core principles of "stop-loss orders." The rationale for not using stop-loss orders in forex trading always depends on the compatibility between capital size and trading model. For large investors with ample funds, not using stop-loss orders is a rational choice based on "capital redundancy, strategic planning, and risk hedging." For long-term investors with light positions, not using stop-loss orders is a risk-controlled approach based on "low position size and trend analysis." However, for ordinary traders with limited funds, large positions, or short-term strategies, not using stop-loss orders is equivalent to blindly resisting orders, which can easily lead to account collapse due to a single large loss.
Therefore, traders should not blindly follow the "no stop-loss" strategy. They must first clarify their own financial strength, trading goals, and risk tolerance, and then establish an appropriate risk control system. Whether using stop-loss orders or not, the key is to "match the strategy to your circumstances," rather than pursuing a single operation method.

In the field of forex trading, one reality that must be clearly understood is that day trading is an extremely difficult model. For most traders, the probability of achieving stable long-term profits is extremely low. This difficulty stems not from a lack of skill, but rather from the multiple inherent difficulties inherent in the short-term nature of day trading. These difficulties compound to form an insurmountable barrier to profitability.

---

The short-term trap: passively falling into random trading and a logical dead end. The core characteristic of intraday trading is its extremely short trading cycles (typically lasting from a few minutes to a few hours). However, the essence of short-term market cycles is random fluctuations within a larger trend. This randomness directly traps traders in a vicious cycle of random trading, from which they find it difficult to escape.
Large-term cycles (such as daily and weekly charts) have clear and consistent trends, while short-term intraday cycles (such as 15-minute and hourly charts) are more influenced by random factors like short-term capital flows and market sentiment fluctuations. These trends are extremely unstable and may even lack a clear trend. Attempting to capture "trend opportunities" within short-term cycles is essentially "looking for patterns within random fluctuations," making it easy to fall into a state of random trading based on intuition.
More importantly, the instant feedback provided by short-term cycles can reinforce this vicious cycle: if a random trade yields a profit, traders may mistake "luck" for "ability," further relying on random decisions. If losses continue, they may increase their trading frequency in a desperate attempt to recoup their losses, creating a vicious cycle of "random trading → losses → more frequent random trading → greater losses." This dilemma isn't a matter of whether traders want to avoid it or not; it's the randomness of short-term cycles that forces most people into a passive, difficult-to-break situation.
Emotional Outburst: Short-term fluctuations trigger high-frequency psychological shocks. The short-term nature of intraday trading impacts traders' emotions at a far higher frequency than other trading models, and few are immune:
Short-term market fluctuations are rapid and reversals are frequent. Traders must make frequent decisions about "entry, exit, and stop-loss" within a short period of time. Every price fluctuation can trigger emotional fluctuations: profits can easily breed greed, leading to a desire to maximize gains; losses can easily trigger fear, leading to a rush to stop losses and exit. Even if positions remain unchanged, short-term fluctuations can cause anxiety, fearing profit drawdowns or widening losses.
These high-frequency emotional shocks can gradually undermine traders' discipline: originally planned trading plans can be prematurely stopped out of fear of a short-term pullback; originally set profit targets can be delayed due to greed over a quick profit. Ultimately, emotions replace strategy as the driving force behind trading decisions, leading to a "discrepancy between knowledge and action." This is one of the core reasons why most day traders lose money.
High-frequency trading risks: Frequency of trading is positively correlated with the probability of error. Short-term trading naturally involves "high frequency," and increasing frequency directly leads to an "exponential increase in the probability of error."
In pursuit of "accumulating short-term profits," day traders often significantly increase their trading frequency, with some even trading dozens of times a day. However, each trade involves multiple decision-making stages, including trend assessment, point selection, position setting, and stop-loss and take-profit planning. The more steps involved and the higher the frequency, the greater the likelihood of error. This could be a misjudgment of the trend, a misplaced entry point, or an inappropriate stop-loss setting. Any small mistake is magnified in high-frequency trading, accumulating into substantial losses.
Even more seriously, high-frequency trading can also lead to "transaction cost erosion": while the spread and fees for foreign exchange transactions may seem low per trade, with high-frequency trading, the cumulative costs can significantly erode profits. For example, if a trader's single transaction cost is 1 pip, and they trade 20 times a day, the cost alone must cover their profit of 20 pips. However, the fluctuation range of a short-term market is often less than 10 pips. This means that even if the judgment accuracy is 50%, losses may still occur due to costs. The Stop-Loss Dilemma: Both wide and narrow stop-loss settings struggle to balance risk and reward. For intraday traders, "stop-loss setting" is an unsolvable problem. The volatility of short-term market cycles means that neither wide nor narrow stop-loss settings can achieve a balance between risk and reward:
Setting a narrow stop-loss (e.g., 5-10 pips) may seem to limit single losses, but the random fluctuations of short-term market cycles can easily trigger the stop-loss. Often, the price only briefly breaks through the stop-loss level before immediately reversing. This results in a "false stop-loss," missing out on subsequent profit opportunities and creating a vicious cycle of "stop-loss, pullback, and missed opportunity." The long-term cumulative stop-loss costs are extremely high.
Setting a wide stop-loss range (e.g., 20-30 pips) can reduce the probability of false breakouts, but the profit margin in short-term market cycles is limited (typically, a single profit target is only 10-20 pips). If misjudgment is made, the losses resulting from a wide stop-loss range (20-30 pips) can far exceed potential profits, creating a "small gains, large losses" situation that inevitably leads to losses in the long run.
This "stop-loss dilemma" is an inevitable result of the volatility of short-term cycles and is almost impossible to completely resolve through technical optimization.
The fundamental reason why intraday trading is "difficult to win" is a flawed model. The difficulty of winning in forex day trading is not due to a lack of skill on the part of the trader, but rather a pattern of risk caused by inherent flaws such as the randomness of short-term cycles, high-frequency emotional shocks, the amplification of operational errors, and the stop-loss dilemma. For most traders, overcoming these flaws is far more challenging than other trading models (such as light-weight, long-term positions). Therefore, recognizing the limitations of day trading and choosing a trading model that better suits one's capabilities is the rational choice for achieving long-term profitability.

In a two-way forex trading system, differences in trading cycles directly determine the psychological resilience required of traders. Compared to day trading, swing trading and long-term investing place a greater test on one's resilience.

---

This difference stems not from operational complexity but rather from the challenges of longer holding periods, which traders face: wider swings and a more sustained psychological battle. Long-term investing, in particular, presents far greater psychological strain than short-term trading.
The core psychological challenge of short-term versus long-term trading lies in endurance against long-term uncertainty. Intraday trading typically involves holding positions for no more than a day, and the uncertainty traders face is limited to short-term market fluctuations, with the outcome often determined within the day. However, swing trading (holding positions for days to months) and long-term investing (holding positions for years) face inter-periodic uncertainty, and the psychological strain of this long-term uncertainty increases exponentially: Swing traders must hold their positions through multi-day pullbacks, determining whether a pullback is a normal correction within a trend continuation or a trend reversal signal, while also resisting the urge to prematurely lock in profits. Long-term investors must weather multi-year trend fluctuations, potentially experiencing multiple significant drawdowns (e.g., floating losses of 20% or more), sudden macroeconomic policy changes (e.g., central bank rate hikes or cuts), and geopolitical shocks. Each fluctuation can trigger self-doubt about whether the position is correct. This long-term psychological battle requires a far greater level of inner certainty than is required for intraday trading.
In short, intraday trading tests quick decision-making, while swing and long-term trading tests long-term conviction and patience. The latter requires traders to consistently adhere to their strategies amidst incomplete information and uncertain futures. Building this kind of mental resilience is far more challenging than short-term trading.
Long-term, light-weight strategies: A psychological buffer mechanism that balances fear and greed. Long-term investors generally adopt a "light-weight, long-term" strategy. Its core function is not only to control risk but also to build a psychological buffer against the two emotions most likely to cause poor decision-making during trend fluctuations: the fear of floating losses and the greed of floating profits.
To mitigate the fear of floating losses, avoid premature stop-losses. Long-term investors will establish numerous, light positions (e.g., no single position should account for more than 2% of their total capital) along long-term moving averages (e.g., 60- and 120-day moving averages). When a trend experiences a significant pullback, the floating loss percentage of the overall account is manageable (usually no more than 10%) due to the extremely low risk exposure of individual positions. This "low loss margin" can effectively alleviate traders' fears and prevent them from making premature stop-loss decisions due to concerns about further losses. For example, a long-term investor with $100,000 capital may lightly position five currency pairs along the 120 moving average, each with a position size of $2,000 (2%). Even if a single currency pair experiences a 20% pullback, the loss on each position is only $400, with minimal impact on the overall account, allowing the trader to calmly wait for the trend to return.
Resisting greed due to floating profits: Avoid premature profit-taking. When the trend enters a major extension phase and the account accumulates floating profits, a light position strategy can also be effective: since the absolute value of individual position profits is relatively low, traders are less likely to be tempted to increase their positions or take profits prematurely due to "short-term profit incentives," and can better adhere to the long-term principle of "letting profits run." For example, if a currency pair rises 500 points along a trend, a small $2,000 position will generate a profit of approximately $1,000 (assuming one standard lot of 500 points yields a profit of $5,000, or 0.2 standard lots yields $1,000). This level of profit won't cause excessive surprise, allowing traders to more rationally judge whether the trend will continue and avoid missing out on larger gains due to a rush to cash in.
This "light position" strategy essentially lowers the emotional trigger threshold, allowing traders to maintain rationality amidst trend fluctuations, neither deterred by losses nor overwhelmed by gains. It is a core tool for psychological management in long-term trading.
The psychological experience of intraday and long-term trading: short-term ease versus long-term suffering. There are fundamental differences in the psychological experience of intraday and long-term investing, and this difference directly reflects the difference in the intensity of the psychological test:
Intraday trading: No overnight suffering, and the psychological burden is reduced to a short period of time. Day traders adhere to the principle of "no overnight positions," closing all trades within the same day, regardless of profit or loss. This "short-term closed-loop" trading model eliminates the uncertainty and anxiety of holding positions overnight—no need to worry about market gaps caused by sudden policy changes or data releases at night, nor does it require them to repeatedly deliberate on whether their positions are correct during extended non-trading hours. This "short-term" psychological burden shortens emotional fluctuations, allows for quicker recovery, and reduces overall mental strain.
Long-term investment: the prolonged torment and pain of holding positions for years. Long-term investors hold positions for years, during which they endure multiple levels of psychological torture:
The torment of time: They must wait for trend validation for months or even years, potentially experiencing cycles of hope and disappointment (e.g., a trend repeatedly tests support levels, with each pullback potentially triggering concerns about its end).
The torment of volatility: They must face the test of significant profit drawdowns (e.g., a 50% profit is then reduced to 20% due to a trend pullback). This psychological shock of "gaining and then losing" can easily trigger the urge to take profits and exit. The torment of external interference: They must withstand the influence of market noise (e.g., media bearishness, analyst disagreements), and maintain their own judgment despite others' doubts. This kind of "lonely perseverance" is a tremendous test of their mental resilience.
This "long-term torment" stems not from losses but from the psychological exhaustion of long-term uncertainty. Even if profits are ultimately realized, the psychological torment during this process far exceeds that of short-term intraday trading, which is the core reason why most traders find it difficult to persist in long-term investing.
Mental resilience is the core competency of both swing and long-term trading. In forex trading, the difficulty of intraday trading lies in "technical judgment and execution speed," while the difficulty of swing and long-term trading lies in "mental resilience and long-term conviction." For traders, choosing a swing or long-term trading model not only means choosing a longer holding period, but also a more rigorous psychological test. Only those with "the endurance to withstand long-term uncertainty," "the rationality to balance fear and greed," and "the resilience to endure long-term hardships" can achieve stable profits in both swing and long-term trading. This is also the key difference between ordinary traders and mature long-term investors.

In two-way forex trading, if traders hope to achieve the state of "the great way is simple," they must first undergo a complex process of learning and accumulation.

---

Otherwise, the so-called "the great way is simple" is nothing but a castle in the air. Forex traders need to systematically acquire the knowledge, common sense, skills, mindset, and experience associated with forex trading. During this process, investors must redouble their efforts to quickly grasp the essence of forex trading.
Without this dedication, a trader may never fully develop their knowledge, common sense, skills, mindset, or accumulated experience in forex trading. Only after accumulating sufficient rich and complex experience can a forex trader simplify the complex, eliminate the false and retain the true, and thus filter and refine the true essence of investment trading.
In short, without extensive learning and in-depth accumulation, any discussion of "the ultimate simplicity" will be a tree without roots.

---

• 
• 

---

13711580480@139.com

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

z.x.n@139.com

Mr. Z-X-N

China · Guangzhou

---